Benetton, which for years had enjoyed great success with a unique brand of clothing and provocative advertising, had to rethink its marketing strategy when new fast fashion competitors such as Zara and H&M entered the young fashion market and started capturing market share and brand loyalty through a comprehensive marketing strategy.
Zara understood the new patterns of consumer behaviour of teenagers and young adults – markets that craved new styles quickly and cheaply and were happy with ‘disposable clothing’. Zara studied the marketing mix variables and saw that global supply network management, service process and physical evidence such as store layout and design were more important than traditional marketing expenditure on advertising.
Zara’s advertising budget is 0.03 per cent of its revenues, which is very different to Benetton that focused on creative advertising, spending €80 million on advertising alone. Benetton has now seen the errors of its ways, investing over €160 million in modernising its global supply chain. It can now deliver new styles to its worldwide stores once a week rather than once a month, which was its traditional delivery strategy.
According to Vincenzo Scognamiglio, the head designer of Benetton, ‘Time is my enemy.’ Zara and H&M have very lean supply chains capable of replenishing shelves in days rather than months. Managing your supply network can be as important as style in the increasingly cut-throat business of mass market cloths.
Marketing means understanding customer and consumer needs and making marketing choices to match these needs.Zara prospered due to its focus on rapid delivery of fashion styles to the market while Benetton floundered due to its over-focus on advertising. Advertising is not everything, marketers needs to use the full range of the marketing mix variables to succeed.
Comments
Post a Comment